reanimator/bee
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

raid: parse storcli64/storcli2's actual per-slot drive JSON shape

Browse Source 
RAID Controller Management showed "No drives detected" for a live
SAS3808-iMR controller even though storcli64 clearly enumerates its
drives. Root cause: the "eall/sall show all J" drive-listing parser
(collector/raid.go and its webui/raid_mgmt.go duplicate) assumed
drives are reported as a single "Drive Information" array, but real
storcli64/storcli2 output nests each drive under its own dynamically
named key ("Drive /c0/e69/s0", paired with a "... - Detailed
Information" key) — confirmed against a live techdump/storcli64-drives.json
capture. The assumed shape was never actually produced by the tool, so
this affected every storcli64/storcli2 controller, not just Tri-Mode
ones (the storcli2 fallback added in b7f015c never got a chance to
mask it in practice, since storcli2 itself reports zero controllers on
this hardware — a separate, unrelated tool-side gap).

Both parsers now read "Response Data" as a raw key map and pull drives
from either shape, so older storcli output using the array form still
works alongside the real per-slot form.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mikhail Chusavitin
2026-07-07 17:21:05 +03:00
co-authored by Claude Sonnet 5
parent 2d84ddb577
commit 4e306ff78c
4 changed files with 213 additions and 109 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
audit/internal/collector/raid.go
+65 -43
View File
@@ -103,13 +103,16 @@ func collectStorcliDrives() []schema.HardwareStorage {
}
// collectStorcli2Drives covers Broadcom Tri-Mode controllers (e.g.
// SAS3808-iMR/9500 series), which storcli64 can enumerate at a basic level
// but whose drives it never finds — a separate tool/JSON schema (storcli2)
// is required. storcli2's "Drive Information" array shape matches storcli64's
// (confirmed against Broadcom's published drive-info-schema.json), so
// parseStorcliDrivesJSON is reused as-is; only the controller enumeration
// and per-controller invocation syntax differ (storcli2 wants an explicit
// /cN target rather than storcli64's /call wildcard).
// SAS3808-iMR/9500 series) via storcli2, Broadcom's separate tool for this
// controller line. On at least one confirmed SAS3808-iMR system storcli2
// itself reports zero controllers even though storcli64 sees the controller
// and its drives fine (a tool-side gap, not something parseable around), so
// this is run as an additional source alongside storcli64, not a
// replacement. parseStorcliDrivesJSON is reused as-is since storcli2 and
// storcli64 share the same "Response Data" drive-listing shape; only the
// controller enumeration and per-controller invocation syntax differ
// (storcli2 wants an explicit /cN target rather than storcli64's /call
// wildcard).
func collectStorcli2Drives() []schema.HardwareStorage {
sysOut, err := raidToolQuery("storcli2", "show", "all", "J")
if err != nil {
@@ -492,41 +495,7 @@ func parseSSACLIInterface(raw string) string {
}
}
func parseStorcliDrivesJSON(raw []byte) []schema.HardwareStorage {
var doc struct {
Controllers []struct {
ResponseData struct {
DriveInformation []struct {
EIDSlt string `json:"EID:Slt"`
State string `json:"State"`
Size string `json:"Size"`
Intf string `json:"Intf"`
Med string `json:"Med"`
Model string `json:"Model"`
SN string `json:"SN"`
Sp string `json:"Sp"`
Type string `json:"Type"`
} `json:"Drive Information"`
} `json:"Response Data"`
} `json:"Controllers"`
}
if err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &doc); err != nil {
slog.Warn("raid: parse storcli json failed", "err", err)
return nil
}
var drives []schema.HardwareStorage
for _, ctl := range doc.Controllers {
for _, d := range ctl.ResponseData.DriveInformation {
if s := storcliDriveToStorage(d); s != nil {
drives = append(drives, *s)
}
}
}
return drives
}
func storcliDriveToStorage(d struct {
type storcliDrive struct {
EIDSlt string `json:"EID:Slt"`
State string `json:"State"`
Size string `json:"Size"`
@@ -536,7 +505,60 @@ func storcliDriveToStorage(d struct {
SN string `json:"SN"`
Sp string `json:"Sp"`
Type string `json:"Type"`
}) *schema.HardwareStorage {
}
// storcliDrivePerSlotKeyRe matches "Response Data" keys like "Drive /c0/e69/s0"
// — real storcli64/storcli2 "eall/sall show all J" output nests each drive
// under its own dynamically-named key instead of a shared "Drive Information"
// array (confirmed against a live SAS3808-iMR dump: the top-level "Drive
// Information" array this parser previously assumed simply isn't present).
// It must not match the paired "Drive /c0/e69/s0 - Detailed Information" key.
var storcliDrivePerSlotKeyRe = regexp.MustCompile(`^Drive /c\d+/e\d+/s\d+$`)
func parseStorcliDrivesJSON(raw []byte) []schema.HardwareStorage {
var doc struct {
Controllers []struct {
ResponseData map[string]json.RawMessage `json:"Response Data"`
} `json:"Controllers"`
}
if err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &doc); err != nil {
slog.Warn("raid: parse storcli json failed", "err", err)
return nil
}
var drives []schema.HardwareStorage
for _, ctl := range doc.Controllers {
// Older storcli output (or "show" without "all") reports a single
// "Drive Information" array instead of per-slot keys.
if raw, ok := ctl.ResponseData["Drive Information"]; ok {
var list []storcliDrive
if err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &list); err == nil {
for _, d := range list {
if s := storcliDriveToStorage(d); s != nil {
drives = append(drives, *s)
}
}
}
}
for key, raw := range ctl.ResponseData {
if !storcliDrivePerSlotKeyRe.MatchString(key) {
continue
}
var list []storcliDrive
if err := json.Unmarshal(raw, &list); err != nil {
continue
}
for _, d := range list {
if s := storcliDriveToStorage(d); s != nil {
drives = append(drives, *s)
}
}
}
}
return drives
}
func storcliDriveToStorage(d storcliDrive) *schema.HardwareStorage {
present := true
status := mapRAIDDriveStatus(d.State)
s := schema.HardwareStorage{
audit/internal/collector/raid_storcli2_test.go
+35
View File
@@ -73,3 +73,38 @@ func TestCollectStorcli2DrivesEndToEnd(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("drives[0]=%#v want serial S6EYNE0T123456", drives[0])
}
}
// TestParseStorcliDrivesJSONPerSlotKeys regression-tests against a live
// SAS3808-iMR "storcli64 /call/eall/sall show all J" dump: "Response Data"
// has no "Drive Information" array at all, only per-slot keys like
// "Drive /c0/e69/s0" (plus a paired "... - Detailed Information" key that
// must be skipped). The previous parser, which only looked for "Drive
// Information", silently returned zero drives against this real output.
func TestParseStorcliDrivesJSONPerSlotKeys(t *testing.T) {
raw := []byte(`{
"Controllers": [
{
"Command Status": {"Status": "Success"},
"Response Data": {
"Drive /c0/e69/s0": [
{"EID:Slt": "69:0", "DID": 0, "State": "JBOD", "DG": "-", "Size": "447.130 GB", "Intf": "SATA", "Med": "SSD", "Model": "SAMSUNG MZ7L3480HCHQ-00B7C", "Sp": "U", "Type": "-"}
],
"Drive /c0/e69/s0 - Detailed Information": {
"Drive /c0/e69/s0 State": {"Shield Counter": 0}
}
}
}
]
}`)
drives := parseStorcliDrivesJSON(raw)
if len(drives) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("drives=%d want 1 (%#v)", len(drives), drives)
}
if drives[0].Model == nil || *drives[0].Model != "SAMSUNG MZ7L3480HCHQ-00B7C" {
t.Fatalf("drives[0]=%#v want model SAMSUNG MZ7L3480HCHQ-00B7C", drives[0])
}
if drives[0].Slot == nil || *drives[0].Slot != "69:0" {
t.Fatalf("drives[0].Slot=%v want 69:0", drives[0].Slot)
}
}