Three bugs, all related to GPU dedup in the Redfish replay pipeline:
1. collectGPUsFromProcessors (redfish_replay.go): GPU-type Processor entries
(Systems/HGX_Baseboard_0/Processors/GPU_SXM_N) were not deduplicated against
existing PCIeDevice GPUs on Supermicro HGX. The chassis-ID lookup keyed on
processor Id ("GPU_SXM_1") but the chassis is named "HGX_GPU_SXM_1" — lookup
returned nothing, serial stayed empty, UUID was unseen → 8 duplicate GPU rows.
Fix: read SerialNumber directly from the Processor doc first; chassis lookup
is now a fallback override (as it was designed for MSI).
2. looksLikeGPU (redfish.go): NVSwitch PCIe devices (Model="NVSwitch",
Manufacturer="NVIDIA") were classified as GPUs because "nvidia" matched the
GPU hint list. Fix: early return false when Model contains "nvswitch".
3. gpuDocDedupKey (redfish.go): commit 9df29b1 changed the dedup key to prefer
slot|model before path, which collapsed two distinct GPUs with identical model
names in GraphicsControllers into one entry. Fix: only serial and BDF are used
as cross-path stable dedup keys; fall back to Redfish path when neither is
present. This also restores TestReplayCollectGPUs_DedupUsesRedfishPathBeforeHeuristics
which had been broken on main since 9df29b1.
Added tests:
- TestCollectGPUsFromProcessors_SupermicroHGX: Processor GPU dedup when
chassis-ID naming convention does not match processor Id
- TestReplayCollectGPUs_DedupCrossChassisSerial: same GPU via two Chassis
PCIeDevice trees with matching serials → collapsed to one
- TestLooksLikeGPU_NVSwitchExcluded: NVSwitch is not a GPU
Added rule to bible-local/09-testing.md: dedup/filter/classify functions must
cover true-positive, true-negative, and the vendor counter-case axes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
09 — Testing
Required before merge
go test ./...
All tests must pass before any change is merged.
Where to add tests
| Change area | Test location |
|---|---|
| Collectors | internal/collector/*_test.go |
| HTTP handlers | internal/server/*_test.go |
| Exporters | internal/exporter/*_test.go |
| Parsers | internal/parser/vendors/<vendor>/*_test.go |
Exporter tests
The Reanimator exporter has comprehensive coverage:
| Test file | Coverage |
|---|---|
reanimator_converter_test.go |
Unit tests per conversion function |
reanimator_integration_test.go |
Full export with realistic AnalysisResult |
Run exporter tests only:
go test ./internal/exporter/...
go test ./internal/exporter/... -v -run Reanimator
go test ./internal/exporter/... -cover
Guidelines
- Prefer table-driven tests for parsing logic (multiple input variants).
- Do not rely on network access in unit tests.
- Test both the happy path and edge cases (missing fields, empty collections).
- When adding a new vendor parser, include at minimum:
Detect()test with a positive and a negative sample file list.Parse()test with a minimal but representative archive.
Dedup and filtering functions — mandatory coverage
Any function that deduplicates, filters, or classifies hardware inventory items must have tests covering all three axes before the code is considered done:
| Axis | What to test | Why |
|---|---|---|
| True positive | Items that ARE duplicates are collapsed to one | Proves the function works |
| True negative | Items that are NOT duplicates are kept separate | Proves the function doesn't over-collapse |
| Counter-case | The scenario that motivated the original code still works after changes | Prevents regression from future fixes |
Worked example — GPU dedup regression (2026-03-11)
collectGPUsFromProcessors was added for MSI (chassis Id matches processor Id).
No tests → when Supermicro HGX arrived (chassis Id = "HGX_GPU_SXM_1", processor Id = "GPU_SXM_1"),
the chassis lookup silently returned nothing, serial stayed empty, UUID was new → 8 duplicate GPUs.
Simultaneously, fixing gpuDocDedupKey to use slot|model before path collapsed two distinct
GraphicsControllers GPUs with the same model into one — breaking an existing test that had no
counter-case for the path-fallback scenario.
Required test matrix for any dedup function:
TestXxx_CollapsesDuplicates — same item via two sources → 1 result
TestXxx_KeepsDistinct — two different items with same model → 2 results
TestXxx_<VendorThatMotivated> — the specific vendor/setup that triggered the code
Practical rule
When you write a new filter/dedup/classify function, ask:
- Does my test cover the vendor that motivated this code?
- Does my test cover a different vendor or naming convention where the function must NOT fire?
- If I change the dedup key logic, do existing tests still exercise the old correct behavior?
If any answer is "no" — add the missing test before committing.